|
Post-construction visualisation of
the Horns Rev offshore wind farm
Post-construction visualisation
As written in the report "Horns Rev Havmøllepark –
landskabelig og visuel vurdering" (The Horns Rev offshore wind
farm – evaluation of impacts on the landscape and of the wind
farm's visibility) the visibility of an offshore wind farm depends
on a number of different factors such as viewpoint (from where the
photo is taken), character of the coastal landscape, weather
conditions, etc. These factors may either increase or limit the
visibility of the wind farm.
During a
12-month period there will be a few days on which elevated offshore
structures can be seen over the surface of the sea and over a long
distance. However, these days represent a very limited number in
relation to a full calendar year. Most of the time the weather
conditions will contribute to minimising the visibility of the wind
farm due to haze, clouds and reflections from the surface of the sea
(e.g. mirages). On some days the wind farm may not be visible at
all.
The photos for
the visualisation of the wind farm were taken on days of optimum
weather conditions to show the wind farm at the highest possible
visibility over a long distance. On these photos the wind turbines
are shown with the rotor facing the camera. From the chosen
viewpoint the wind farm is shown at the widest possible visual
angle. The two photos below are visualisations; i.e. the photos were
taken before the wind farm was built. The turbines have been added
as graphic elements.
Visualisations

Visualisation from Blåvands Huk
click
here to enlarge visualisation

Visualisation from Skallingen
click
here to enlarge visualisation
(go
to top)
Photos taken after the construction of the wind farm
After the
construction of the wind farm was completed, some photos were taken
from the two viewpoints above – the same viewpoints as for the
visualisation. The purpose was to show that the visualisation gave a
correct and truthful picture of the visibility of the wind farm at
the two closest points on the coast and to compare visualisation and
photo. To check the height of the wind turbines, a computerized
post-construction visualisation has been made of the two elements
– visualisation and photo. The post-construction visualisation is
made by using two photos taken by the same camera and from the same
viewpoint. The photos were then developed and scanned. All
procedures were done in one and the same way allowing for a direct
comparison of the two photos.
By means of
the computerized post-construction visualisation it is proven that
the height of the wind turbines corresponds in the visualisation
exactly to the height of the wind turbines in the photo taken of the
wind farm in operation.
In the
visualisation, however, the wind turbines tend to be more visible
than in reality, especially the wind turbines at the longest
distance from the viewpoint owing to the fact that the visualisation
is made to show the 'worst case scenario.' Such a situation may
arise on a day of extremely high visibility.
In general, it
may be concluded that the visualisation made before the construction
of the wind farm gives a quite realistic impression of how the wind
farm appears on a day of very high visibility.
In real life
the eye is capable of conceiving and focusing on an object over long
distances. And this much more than what can be shown in print.
Photos

Photo taken Blåvandshuk
click
here to enlarge photo

Photo from Skallingen
click
here to enlarge photo
Conclusions
In the report "Horns Rev Havmøllepark – landskabelig og
visuel vurdering" (The Horns Rev offshore wind farm –
evaluation of impacts on the landscape and of the wind farm's
visibility) it is concluded:
'The Horns Rev
offshore wind farm has very few visual impacts on the maritime and
coastal landscapes, taking into account the wind turbine heights
shown in the visualisations. The coastal landscape at and around Blåvands
Huk seems affected to a certain but not to a very high degree. The
visual impact on the maritime landscape in general is considered
minimum or even insignificant.
The overall
conclusion, then, is that the site chosen for the Horns Rev wind
farm is ideal and without substantial visual impacts.'
The above is
still a precise and correct conclusion on the overall impression of
the wind farm. The production of a total of 12 visualisations -
showing the wind farm from different angles and at different
distances - has resulted in a realistic and very truthful picture of
how the Horns Rev wind farm presents itself in the maritime
landscape today.
(go
to top)
|